Was Susan Nicholson failed by police before she was killed by her partner? The Coroner and police don’t want to know
Consent and Deception: Undercover Policing and Sexual Crimes
Spike in Domestic Homicide Brings New Fear for Migrant Women
The Poems inside us all
Reflections on coercive control
Afsana Lachaux - the final battle
Kiranjit Ahluwalia and Sally Challen – what has changed after 30 years of campaigning for justice?
Southall Black Sisters: Forty and still going strong
“We'll campaign until the "rough sex" defence can no longer be used to blame women for their own assault or death”.
Who was Emma Humphreys
Lachaux v Independent News Print Limited and Another - a vital test case on women’s rights to freedom of expression in the face of violence and abuse.
On 13 November 2018, the Supreme Court will preside over a significant test case on libel law with far reaching implications for women’s rights.
Women who kill: Can you help with our research to ascertain whether and how women are discriminated against in the criminal justice system?
Justice for Women, in conjunction with the Centre for Women’s Justice, have commissioned a study examining the criminal justice response to women who kill men who have been abusive to them. The study aims to examine the impacts of the changes instituted in the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and to identify the gaps that remain in order that outcomes for women who have killed abusive men can be further improved.
Help us get justice for Jourdain →
We have launched a new campaign to challenge the CPS decision not to prosecute despite strong evidence surrounding Jourdain Baptiste’s death…and we need your help.
The Times Lawyer of the Week
Harriet Wistrich is this week’s The Times Lawyer of the Week
Victims of sexual violence are right to fear another John Worboys →
Worboys: High Court rules that the Parole Board decision to release John Radford, formerly known as Worboys, is quashed and that Rule 25 of Parole Board Rules is unlawful
The Divisional Court today handed down judgment following a judicial review challenge brought by two of John Worboys’ victims known as DSD and NBV.
Sex trade survivors win crucial victory : disclosure of soliciting convictions is a "disproportionate interference with private life" and "not in accordance with the law".
The High Court today handed down judgment in a ground breaking judicial review brought by three women formerly involved in prostitution, challenging the Government’s Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) Regulations.
Supreme Court rule in favour of Worboys survivors
The full judgement of DSD and NBV v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
SUPREME COURT CONCLUDES THAT THE POLICE HAVE A LEGAL DUTY UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT TO EFFECTIVELY INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF RAPE AND SERIOUS SEXUAL ASSAULT IN WORBOYS CASE
The Supreme Court has today handed down judgment in a landmark case against the Metropolitan Police Service, brought by two women who were victims of John Worboys, “Black cab rapist”.
Update on 'Why was John Worboys granted parole? His victims need answers.'
Thanks to your amazing support, we have won the very first stage of the Judicial review challenge by achieving a stay on the release of Worboys until an urgent half-day hearing that will be listed between 6 to 8 February.