Centre for Women's Justice support David and James Challen’s campaign for justice for their mum Sally
Protest over libel case that has chillinag implications for women who speak out over domestic violence
INQUEST and Centre for Women’s Justice respond to prosecution following the deaths of Khaola Saleem and Raneem Oudeh
CWJ & Birnberg Peirce comment on Parole Board decision not to release John Worboys/Radford
Permission Hearing: Mother of 22-year-old victim challenges descision not to prosecute suspect for her death
High Court to decide whether proceedings will be heard
Cox report: Bullying, Harassment and Sexual Harassment in Parliament
Family of Lisa Skidmore welcome the damning report from HMI Probation on how system failures contributed to her death.
CWJ statement on the release of rapist Stephen Mitchell
Mother of 22-Year Old Victim Challenges Decision Not to Prosecute Suspect for Her Death
Women who kill: Can you help with our research to ascertain whether and how women are discriminated against in the criminal justice system?
Justice for Women, in conjunction with the Centre for Women’s Justice, have commissioned a study examining the criminal justice response to women who kill men who have been abusive to them. The study aims to examine the impacts of the changes instituted in the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and to identify the gaps that remain in order that outcomes for women who have killed abusive men can be further improved.
Help us get justice for Jourdain →
We have launched a new campaign to challenge the CPS decision not to prosecute despite strong evidence surrounding Jourdain Baptiste’s death…and we need your help.
The Times Lawyer of the Week
Harriet Wistrich is this week’s The Times Lawyer of the Week
Victims of sexual violence are right to fear another John Worboys →
Worboys: High Court rules that the Parole Board decision to release John Radford, formerly known as Worboys, is quashed and that Rule 25 of Parole Board Rules is unlawful
The Divisional Court today handed down judgment following a judicial review challenge brought by two of John Worboys’ victims known as DSD and NBV.
Sex trade survivors win crucial victory : disclosure of soliciting convictions is a "disproportionate interference with private life" and "not in accordance with the law".
The High Court today handed down judgment in a ground breaking judicial review brought by three women formerly involved in prostitution, challenging the Government’s Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) Regulations.
Supreme Court rule in favour of Worboys survivors
The full judgement of DSD and NBV v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
Update on 'Why was John Worboys granted parole? His victims need answers.'
Thanks to your amazing support, we have won the very first stage of the Judicial review challenge by achieving a stay on the release of Worboys until an urgent half-day hearing that will be listed between 6 to 8 February.
Update on CrowdJustice: 'Why was John Worboys granted parole? His victims need answers.'
So many thanks again from everyone involved in this case but particularly from DSD and NBV. They have truly been heartened by the support
Judicial Review on behalf of two victims of John Worboys issued in High Court today.
On 25 January solicitors on behalf of two women who were raped and sexually assaulted by John Worboys issued a claim for judicial review against the Parole Board and the Secretary of State for Justice (SSJ) challenging the decision to release John Worboys (now known as John Radford) from prison.